You wrote the architecture into the rules file three times. It reads it and builds right past it.

Hand over the execution, keep the decision

Tuesday, 14:00. Six agent PRs of 800 lines each in the queue, no trace of why the agent built it that way, stand-up in an hour. The tools that were supposed to help have moved the bottleneck into review. You are the bottleneck and you know it.

The alternative is to move the execution and keep the decision. How much oversight you keep while doing so is a per-project setting, from every action needs an approvalto only the consequential ones; without a set level the task runs through. The handover point stays the same in every case: a draft pull request in your repository that a human merges.

Governance that does not live in the wiki

Every team has architecture rules. Most of them live in a document that is read during onboarding and forgotten afterwards, and the deviation surfaces in review, when it is already built.

With Anvil Coder the rule is part of the task. Guardrails stand in every prompt; a stack profile records language, framework, architecture and version levels and is rendered at the front of the prompts. What deviates from the rule surfaces where it comes into being.

How a task enters the system

The trigger is a story

You drag a story onto the trigger state, in the internal board or in YouTrack, Jira, GitHub or GitLab. The system picks it up, plans, executes and sets the state to “To Verify” at the end.

Barriers instead of trust

A phase begins only when all work steps of the previous one are finished. At the end a consistency pass checks the whole against itself before anything reaches your review queue.

One commit per step

Every work step leaves its own commit with the task it came from. You read the PR like a log, not like a thousand-line diff.

The stack is a contract

Language, framework, architecture and version levels stand as a stack profile at the front of every prompt. On request a gate checks against it once more at the end.